[ad_1]
NEW DELHI: National Conference leader Omar Abdullah’s plea for divorce citing cruelty by his estranged wife Payal was rejected Tuesday by the Delhi High Court, which ruled that there’s no merit in his appeal.
A bench of justices Sanjeev Sachdeva and Vikas Mahajan upheld a 2016 family court decision that denied the former J&K CM a decree of divorce. “We find no infirmity in the view taken by the family court that the allegations of cruelty were vague and unacceptable, that the appellant failed to prove any act which could be termed as an act of cruelty, be it physical or mental, towards him,” the HC said.
Abdullah had claimed his marriage had broken down irretrievably.He informed the court that the couple, married on September 1, 1994, had been living separately since 2009. He alleged being subjected to “unreasonable conduct” by Payal, causing pain and harassment.
The family court dismissed Abdullah’s plea, stating that he could not substantiate claims of cruelty or desertion.
In August, though his appeal was pending, the high court had directed Abdullah to pay Rs 1.5 lakh as monthly interim maintenance to his estranged wife, emphasising his financial capacity to provide a decent standard of living for his family.
The court had also ordered him to pay Rs 60,000 monthly for the education of his two sons.
A bench of justices Sanjeev Sachdeva and Vikas Mahajan upheld a 2016 family court decision that denied the former J&K CM a decree of divorce. “We find no infirmity in the view taken by the family court that the allegations of cruelty were vague and unacceptable, that the appellant failed to prove any act which could be termed as an act of cruelty, be it physical or mental, towards him,” the HC said.
Abdullah had claimed his marriage had broken down irretrievably.He informed the court that the couple, married on September 1, 1994, had been living separately since 2009. He alleged being subjected to “unreasonable conduct” by Payal, causing pain and harassment.
The family court dismissed Abdullah’s plea, stating that he could not substantiate claims of cruelty or desertion.
In August, though his appeal was pending, the high court had directed Abdullah to pay Rs 1.5 lakh as monthly interim maintenance to his estranged wife, emphasising his financial capacity to provide a decent standard of living for his family.
The court had also ordered him to pay Rs 60,000 monthly for the education of his two sons.
[ad_2]
Source link
